THIS IS THE REALITY OF WHAT ENGAGING A SOLICITOR IS LIKE
DECEIT & DISCRIMINATION
Colluded with institutional persistent discriminatory behaviour towards me
Behaved in a way as to cause me maximum harm through harassment continuing case,
Acted to increase their funding
Case had no merit but failed to flag that to me
Deliberately hid judgement to prolong fees and create a space for the harassment of me and my family in the hope that we capitulate.
Acted against the judge's recommendation
Sustained campaign of no strong case, "my advice is to settle and pay Williams" for the fictitious charges laid with the assistance of Leics police -
barrister/judge looking later saw 'case against me was without merit'
16 May 2013 09:47 iem Natalie Howes with order from 15.04.13 Hearing @ Nuneaton - No mention of Fast Track
<<RE Trespass Dispute - Order.msg>>
"ONLY RECEIVED ATTENDANCE NOTE IN 2016 WHEN SOLICITORS HAD ENSURED IT WAS TOO LATE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT i.e. TOO LATE TO RECOVER MY COSTS"
15/04/2013 Attendance note showing suitable for Fast Track which NDH hid = SRA definition of deceit, McNeill hid = SRA definition of deceit as designed to ensure my costs could not be recovered
 15/04/2013 Attendance note showing suitable for Fast TrackNDH hid, McNeill hid only the cabal knew
15/04/2013 DJ Kesterton Trespass Dispute - Order
  | |||
Judge said in April 2013 suitable for Fast Track
| |||
Judge said in April 2013 suitable for Fast Track
| |||
29/04/2013 Howes sending Order no mention of Fast Track
29 April 2013
18:38
20/05/2013 Williams contradicting himself again - saying anything to get his own way
Created with Microsoft OneNote 2016.
16/04/2014 draft directions McNeill [deceitful Sm Claims request]
01 August 2016
18:26
<<draft directions 16.4.14.docx>>
 | |||
17/10/2013 15:12 Still Awaiting Land Registry and yet another opportunity for Howes & McNeill to let me know that a Fast Track recommendation was given but nothing forthcoming
17 October 2013
19:06
22/11/2013 11:29:00 Urging me to "Settle" repeated - no mention of the Fast Track
22 November 2013
31/01/2014 - Saying settle SmClaim it's a favourable offer
03/02/2014 Settle settle settle likely SmClaims - No mention of DJ's advising Fast Track - just insistence that they were ensuring my costs were unrecoverable
03/02/2014 After being kept on phone for 30+minutes where they're saying "SETTLE-it's a good offer"the calls were left for voicemail
03 February 2014
06/02/2014 Answer: Let Williams pay for a stay or proceed to court - still waiting Natalie/McNeill for you to tell me that the judge said go to Fast Track so I can recover my costs but nothing from them about the deception
06 February 2014
07/02/2014 They didn't like the answer Proceed and to court and then decided they were no longer prepared to act - Still not a peep on the Fast Track recommendation from you though hey ? How is it in my best interests that you ensure my costs from a bogus claim cannot be recovered!!! Interest of "both" parties when what you mean is it is for Williams' benefit
| ||||||||||
07 February 2014
03/09/2014 Still no mention the DJ recommended Fast Track which would enable me to claim costs from your client is there?
03 September 2014
20:23
21/10/2014 16:55 on Friday 17/10/2014 is the time the Claimant's solicitor with the "strong case, my suggestion to you is settle and pay Mr Williams £££££s" Files this at court for the 10:00 Thursday 23/04/2014 hearing. I get to know about it from Tuesday's post
21 October 2014
<<141017 Williams app for Discontinuance Order.pdf>>
21/10/2014 16:29
20/10/2014
20 October 2014
21/10/2014
21 October 2014
28/03/2016 Requesting Howes shows me the attendance note [15.04.14 Hearing] which shows Fast Track suggested by DJ Kesterton
28 March 2016
20/05/2016 Requesting the attendance note [15.04.14 Hearing] which shows Fast Track suggested by DJ Kesterton - They all really don't want me to see the confirmatory notes showing deceit from judiciary
20 May 2016
Finally here is the Attendance Note "Complicated therefore Fast Track
